Legal Opinion
National Treasury Employees Union v. Lyng
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 8, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-2515, 88-2668PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs National Treasury Employees Union (“NTEU”) and National Association of Agricultural Employees (“NAAE”), the collective bargaining representatives of various employees of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), have moved for a preliminary injunction against certain portions of the USDA’s Drug Free Workplace Program (the “program” or “plan”). Specifically, plaintiffs challenge the provisions of the USDA’s program that require random urinalysis testing of employees in so-called “testing designated positions” and “reasonable…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burka v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- American Federation of Government Employees v. CavazosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Bangert v. HodelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Hartness v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. WatkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.