Stetson v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The defendant assigns as error that: (1) He did not have a proper preliminary examination. (2) The court did not have jurisdiction because a change of venue was improperly granted. (3) Perjury was not proven. (4) Cross-examination of an expert witness was improperly limited.(1) The defendant stood mute on arraignment and a plea of not guilty was entered. His counsel aftérward objected orally to proceeding with the trial for want of a *252proper preliminary examination. The court overruled the objection for two reasons, one of which was that a plea of not guilty had been entered. “Failure or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- State v. ElkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. SchmitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Watts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
- Richards v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HebardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Galicich v. Oregon Short Line R.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- Mark v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. AbdellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952