Legal Opinion

Stetson v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The defendant assigns as error that: (1) He did not have a proper preliminary examination. (2) The court did not have jurisdiction because a change of venue was improperly granted. (3) Perjury was not proven. (4) Cross-examination of an expert witness was improperly limited.(1) The defendant stood mute on arraignment and a plea of not guilty was entered. His counsel aftérward objected orally to proceeding with the trial for want of a *252proper preliminary examination. The court overruled the objection for two reasons, one of which was that a plea of not guilty had been entered. “Failure or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. State v. ElkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. SchmitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Watts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  5. Richards v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HebardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Galicich v. Oregon Short Line R.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Mark v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. AbdellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API