Legal Opinion

Erickson-Puttmann v. Gill

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided May 6, 2002No. C-01-4007-MWBPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.INTRODUCTION.. A. Procedural Background. CN <M 5£KO Ci

B. Factual Background. ^ 0

II.LEGAL ANALYSIS. 966

A. Standards For Summary Judgment. 966

1. Requirements of Rule 56. 967

2. The parties’burdens . 967

3. Summary judgment in employment discrimination cases 968

B. Woodbury County’s Motion For Summary Judgment. 969

1. The prompt remedial action requirement. 970

2. Woodbury County’s response. 971

C. Patrick Gill’s Motion For Summary Judgment. 973

1. Iowa common law claims. 973

2. Sex…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hagen v. Siouxland Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
  2. Krambeck v. Children and Families of Iowa, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
  3. Zimmer v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
  4. Ronald Rumsey v. Woodgrain Millwork, Inc. d/b/a Windsor Windows and Doors, Liz Mallaney, and Clay CoppockSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API