Legal Opinion

Ruohs v. Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Hamilton County. T. M. McConnell, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

Complainant, Ruohs, bought twenty-two bonds, purporting to have been issued by the town of Athens, Tenn., in aid of- the Nashville and Tellico Railroad Company, each for one thousand dollars, and paid for the same $19,800, or at the rate of ninety cents on the dollar. He afterward brought suit against the town of Athens to recover the amount then due him on said bonds, when it was held that the charter of the town of Athens was void, and its bonds, as a consequence, were invalid and void, even in his hands as a loom fide holder for value, and relief was denied him. See the case of Ruohs v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Donaldson v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Merchants' Bank v. Bergen CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Citizens' Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. GiardinoTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Ohio Valley Banking & Trust Co. v. Citizens National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Talbott v. ManardTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Wood v. GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API