In Re Petition of Anonymous 1
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentCaporale, J.
I respectfully dissent. I submit that the judge below had no jurisdiction to entertain this matter under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71-6901 et seq. (Cum. Supp. 1994) and that as a consequence, we have no jurisdiction to review it.
Although jurisdiction was not one of the issues presented by the questions certified to us by the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska with regard to a predecessor statute, Orr v. Knowles, 215 Neb. 49, 337 N.W.2d 699 (1983), and thus not addressed therein, I begin by recalling that an appellate court has both the power and duty to consider on its…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.