Colquitt v. Eureka Producing Co.

SMEDLEY, Judge.

The principal contention of defendants in error on motion for rehearing is that, if the Eureka Producing Company did not acquire the entire leasehold interest in the gas through the assignment executed by Armstrong, it acquired all such interest from Colquitt and Graves through the contract of August 6, 1927. The statement. is made in the motion that the commission’s opinion ignored and did not even mention that contract. This is not correct. The opinion contains the following:

“Dater these parties in order to obtain the drilling of an additional well by defendants in error,…