Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Gross

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 5, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

Since no opposition has been interposed to the-present application, the sole duty of the court in its evaluation is to determine whether the allegations of the petition, when admitted by default of denial, are sufficient to warrant the grant of the relief prayed.

On the allegations of the probable net assets of the estate it is obvious that if the will and codicils are denied probate the intestate share of the applicant will exceed the sum advance payment of which is here sought,

The question thereupon presents itself as to the rights which the petitioner would possess if the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ZweigNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of HearnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of MihlmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  4. Ort v. BlakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  5. In re the Estate of HartfordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of CarllNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  2. Estate of Machat v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  3. In re the Estate of PiconeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  4. In re the Estate of GoldfarbNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API