People v. Harper
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
During his preliminary instructions to the jury, the trial judge outlined the elements of each of the three robbery counts with which the defendant was charged. Because defendant failed *883to object to these instructions, his contention is unpreserved for our review (see People v Brown, 7 NY3d 880 [2006] [decided today]).
Defendant’s challenge to the hearing court’s determination involves a mixed question of law and fact and our review is therefore limited to whether there is record support for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harper v. ErcoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- People v. HeidgenNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. CicconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. CushnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. BarnwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.