Legal Opinion

Zinsmeister v. Stelz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1950Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for dissolution of a partnership between plaintiff and defendant, and for an accounting of the partnership affairs, judgment dismissing the complaint, after trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The finding that plaintiff abandoned the partnership business in April, 1931, is sustained by the evidence. His right to relief is barred not only by the ten-year Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prae. Act, § 53), but also by laches. (Gilmore v. Ham, 142 N. Y. 1; Hutchinson V. Sperry, 158 App. Div. 704, affd. 214 N. Y. 616; Lindley on Partnership [10th ed.], p. 560; cf. Bankers Trust Co.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Bankers Trust Co. v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Bankers Trust Company v. DennisNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Hutchinson v. SperryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. Hutchinson v. . SperryNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API