Legal Opinion

Martin v. Postal Union Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1936No. Civ. 5416PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This action is based upon an insurance policy issued to the plaintiff by the Pacific States Life Assurance Company, and liability, if any, assumed by the defendant. The policy was issued to the plaintiff on the 13th day of June, 1933, the insuring clause of which reads as follows: “Loss of life, limb, sight or time, the cause of which originates and loss occurs while this policy is in full force and effect, which loss results directly and independently of all other causes, from accidental bodily injuries, hereinafter referred to as ‘such injury.’ ”

For total disability, compensation was to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Bank & Trust Co. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Weger v. RochaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Asher v. G. F. Stearns Land & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Montgomery v. RauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Watenpaugh v. State Teacher's Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Collins v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Watenpaugh v. State Teachers' RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Wilson v. McCormick Steamship Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API