Legal Opinion
Simplex Steel Products Co. v. Goleman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 17, 1938No. Appeal, 218PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit to recover a balance alleged to be due by defendant for cer tain steel frames, studs, channels, and pins used as a base for plaster board and known as the “Simplex System.”
The defendant signed the following order addressed to the plaintiff:
“Gentlemen:
“Please enter our order for the Simplex System used on the Bennett Hall Apartments, Camac & Bindley Streets, for the Carroll Construction Co. to be shipped when notified to Vincent Prendeville, Tabor Station, Philadelphia, Pa. via Philadelphia & Reading Railroad.
“Very truly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kroegher v. McConway & Torley Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Tarentum Lumber Co. v. MarvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Carey v. BuckleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Brillinger v. Northern Central RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Simkins v. BarcusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Litton Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Litton Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Luscombe Engineering Co. v. Rolle Casting Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1950