Legal Opinion

Stephen C. Schiff v. Jane Kennedy, and John Doe, and Persons Unknown

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 19, 1982No. 81-2162PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

Stephen Schiff brought this action against his former wife and an unidentified third party, John Doe, for violations of the Federal Wiretap Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2520. The district court dismissed the action against both defendants, concluding that the action against the former wife was barred by the divorce settlement, that the action was res judicata as to the former wife and possibly against Doe, because of an earlier state court proceeding, and finally that this court does not allow John Doe suits. We affirm the judgment in favor of the former wife, but remand with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Jerome R. MacLin v. Deputy Sheriff PaulsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  4. Johnson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1965

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Shawn Massey v. J.J. OjaniitCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  2. Sharyl Attkisson v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. Munz v. ParrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Roper v. Adams CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Munz v. ParrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API