Legal Opinion

Kuh v. Barnett

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided August 19, 1889Published

Appeal from special term. Action by Joshua Kuh against Clarence Barnett, sued as John Barnett, for an injunction. A. preliminary injunction was granted, and on defendant’s motion was vacated. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtTruax, J.

The plaintiff obtained a preliminary injunction upon the complaint and certain affidavits. It was alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff was engaged in the business of selling men’s and boys’ clothing and furnishings at 596 Broadway, in the city of New York; that he had hired the said premises at a large expense, and had stocked them with a large stock of merchandise, and that he had advertised at a considerable cost and expense his said place of business in certain of the daily newspapers of the city of New York; that be had caused to be displayed upon said premises large and prominent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HatchNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  2. Martin v. GrossThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1889
  3. McVicker v. CampaniniNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bliss v. MolterNew York Supreme Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API