Legal Opinion

McVicker v. Campanini

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At chambers. Motion to vacate attachment. Action by John H. McVicker against Italo Oampanini, for breach of contract to lease McVicker’s Theater, Chicago. An attachment issued on the affidavit of plaintiff’s son, and defendant now moves to vacate it.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

This motion is made to vacate an attachment on the pers on which it was granted. The affidavit is made by a son of the plaintiff, who states at the outset of his affidavit that he is acquainted with, and has knowledge of, the facts hereinafter set forth. He then proceeds to state that his father is at present in Chicago, from whom deponent has received instructions to commence and prosecute this action, which has been commenced by the issuing of a summons herein. Then, after stating the nature of the action, and the amount of the alleged indebtedness, the affiant states that the plaintiff is…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dolbeer v. StoutThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1892
  2. Kuh v. BarnettThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API