Legal Opinion

United States v. Leaver

U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review

Decided October 29, 1993No. CGCM 0032; Docket No. 946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon review of this case in 1991, this Court found error in the staff judge advocate’s failure to provide Appellant with a substitute counsel after trial, when Appellant discharged his detailed counsel for claimed ineffective trial representation. We affirmed the findings and sentence upon concluding that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. U.S. v. Leaver, 32 M.J. 995 (C.G.C.M.R.1991).

On appeal, the U.S. Court of Military Appeals, relying on U.S. v. Moseley, 35 M.J. 481 (C.M.A.1992), chose not to apply the harmless error test after finding that the staff judge advocate’s action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LeaverUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. MoseleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. LeaverU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HaireU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1994
  2. United States v. HollingsworthU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. United States v. LeaverU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. ReedU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API