Legal Opinion

Tull v. Federal Express Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 2008No. 103,642. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JANE P. WISEMAN, Judge.

T 1 Appellants David Allen Tull and Aaron Michael Harness appeal from an order of the trial court upon jury verdict granting judgment in favor of Appellees Federal Express Corporation (FedEx) and Bennie Joe Stow-ers, III (Stowers). The primary issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it allowed Appellees to show the jury a computer animation portraying the accident at issue during Appellees' expert witness' testimony. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and affirm its decision. 1

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

T2 On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis R. Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Dunkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Sapulpa v. BIC Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Lawson v. National Steel Erectors Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Amending & Revising Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions-Civil-No. 1.7, 3.26, 6.16, 21.4, 21.7, 23.10, & 23.31Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. People v. DouglasColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. People v. DouglasColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. In Re Amending & Revising Ouji-CivSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  5. People v. DouglasColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API