Legal Opinion

In Re Amending & Revising Ouji-Civ

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 2009No. SCAD No. 2009-41Published

1Opinion of the Court

217 P.3d 620 (2009)

2009 OK 26

In the Matter of AMENDING AND REVISING OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CIVIL-Number 1.7, 3.26, 6.16, 21.4, 21.7, 23.10, and 23.31.

SCAD No. 2009-41.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

April 29, 2009.

¶ 0 ORDER ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CIVIL (SECOND EDITION)

¶ 1 The Court has reviewed the report and recommendations of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Committee for Uniform Civil Jury Instructions requesting adoption of the proposed revisions. The Court accepts the report and finds the revisions should be adopted as modified by the Court.

¶ 2 It is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Parret v. UNICCO Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. N.C. Corff Partnership, Ltd. v. OXY USA, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Kruchowski v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API