Scarborough v. Hall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Amendment. Pleadings. Practice in Superior Court. Before Judge SlMMONS. Crawford Superior Court. March Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Speer, Justice.
D. B. Hall, defendant in error, brought his action of complaint against M. P, Scarborough on a promissory-note, returnable to the March term, .88o, of Crawford superior court, and the same was filed in office on the 26th February, 1880. No process was attached to said writ, but service of a copy of the writ was made personally on the defendant on the first of March, 1880, and due return made thereof by the sheriff. There was no appearance for defendant until the March term, 1881, when, by his counsel, he moved to dismiss said writ for failure of the clerk to annex process.…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Neal-Millard Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Nicholas v. British America Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Crown Laundry v. BurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Banister v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- McGhee v. Mayor of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.