Brakeall v. Weber
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentSabers, Justice
[¶ 31.] I dissent on Issue 1 and would not reach Issues 2 through 4.
[¶ 32.] The failure of the trial court at sentencing to advise Brakeall of the minimum and maximum sentence prevents a knowing, intelligent and voluntary plea and is reversible error.
[¶ 33.] The majority opinion provides mere lip service to the language cited with approval in State v. Richards, as follows: The failure to advise of the mandatory minimum sentence is more than a technical, harmless error and demonstrates a manifestation of injustice.
The trial court’s express statement on the record of an applicable mandatory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Security Savings Bank v. MuellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RichardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002