Legal Opinion

Rose v. Marshall Special School District No. 17

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 10, 1946No. 4-7909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GrifpiN Smith,

Chief Justice. School District No. 17, through the process of annexation, has taken over the area formerly embraced within District No. 79. Legality of the procedure is not questioned. We are only asked to determine whether Chancery Court erred in holding that three-fourths of an acre, with the building formerly used by District No. 79, has been abandoned for school purposes, and whether District No. 17 may continue to' use the property as a bus station. Transportation is supplied by District 17. During bad weather children gather in the building and are afforded a certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conner v. HeatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Williams v. Kirby School District No. 32Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. McCullough v. Swifton Consolidated School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vanndale Special School District No. 6 v. FeltnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Milner v. New Edinburg School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Foresee v. Board of Directors Bergman Special School District No. 8Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. Coffelt v. Decatur School District No. 17Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API