Legal Opinion

Conner v. Heaton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 1943No. 4-6962PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appellees sued appellant in the Boone chancery court for injunctive relief and damages. The substance of their complaint was “that they are citizens and taxpayers of Boone county, Arkansas, and reside in what was formerly known as Plumlee School District No. 55 in said county; that more than forty years since, Bill Plumlee and his wife by their proper deed conveyed to said School District No. 55 and the citizens of said community for church purposes one acre of land, upon which was constructed a. school building soon after said purchase and which was used as a school building and for church…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District No. 1 v. HuntSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Horstmann v. LaFargueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Penny v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Murdock v. Sure Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hankins v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Holthoff v. State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Leo M. Bertagnole, Inc. v. Pine Meadow RanchesUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. City of HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Goodman v. PowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API