Legal Opinion

Davies v. Arthur Murray, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 27, 1970No. Gen. 53,856PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adesko

The plaintiff instituted this action to recover money-paid on contracts for unused hours of dancing instruction which were allegedly unusable because of plaintiff’s physical incapacity. The suit sought cancellation of the contracts and a return of the money paid. Plaintiff’s action was premised upon executory contract law and the fact that the contracts were void as against public policy having been proscribed by a Federal Trade Commission Order. Trial was held without a jury and the court entered judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff seeks to reverse this judgment upon the same grounds that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Bunte Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States Steel Credit Union v. KnightIllinois Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nagy v. BeckleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Schniederjon v. KrupaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Parker v. Arthur Murray, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Pientka v. Board of Fire Commissioners of the North Main Fire Protection DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Gonet v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API