Davies v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adesko
The plaintiff instituted this action to recover money-paid on contracts for unused hours of dancing instruction which were allegedly unusable because of plaintiff’s physical incapacity. The suit sought cancellation of the contracts and a return of the money paid. Plaintiff’s action was premised upon executory contract law and the fact that the contracts were void as against public policy having been proscribed by a Federal Trade Commission Order. Trial was held without a jury and the court entered judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff seeks to reverse this judgment upon the same grounds that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Federal Trade Commission v. Bunte Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States Steel Credit Union v. KnightIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nagy v. BeckleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Schniederjon v. KrupaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Parker v. Arthur Murray, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Pientka v. Board of Fire Commissioners of the North Main Fire Protection DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Gonet v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.