Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Kightlinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1949Published

1DissentCohn, J.

The pertinent portion of the Education Law (§ 224, subd. 1) forbids, without a license theretofore obtained, a person, corporation or an association from conducting, a school of medicine. The name adopted by defendants clearly indicates the field occupied. The use of the name “ Chiropractic Institute of New7 York ” on the pamphlet is concededly insufficient to sustain the first count of the indictment. The Institute does not purport to be a school of medicine nor is there any representation anywhere made in the catalogue in evidence that it is. One of the purposes -of the statute is to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. . PhyfeNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. People v. BencNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Nelson v. State Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  4. People v. . BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Institute of the Metropolis, Inc. v. University of the State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API