People v. Kightlinger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentCohn, J.
The pertinent portion of the Education Law (§ 224, subd. 1) forbids, without a license theretofore obtained, a person, corporation or an association from conducting, a school of medicine. The name adopted by defendants clearly indicates the field occupied. The use of the name “ Chiropractic Institute of New7 York ” on the pamphlet is concededly insufficient to sustain the first count of the indictment. The Institute does not purport to be a school of medicine nor is there any representation anywhere made in the catalogue in evidence that it is. One of the purposes -of the statute is to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. . PhyfeNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- People v. BencNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Nelson v. State Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
- People v. . BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Institute of the Metropolis, Inc. v. University of the State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.