Legal Opinion

Bramble v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 16, 1972No. [Nos. 212 and 213, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

This appeal presents for resolution a question of first impression in this State. We must decide whether the owner of an animal known by him to be vicious can incur liability when that animal attacks and injures a trespasser on the owner’s property. While the law in Maryland regarding the liability of an owner of property to trespassers as well as the liability of owners of vicious animals to persons injured is long established, it does not appear that this Court has ever decided a case in which both these tort principles were involved.

The facts here, as alleged in appellants’ declarations,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Demuth v. Old Town BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  2. Peregoy v. Western Maryland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  3. Read Drug & Chemical Co. v. Colwill Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Telak v. MaszczenskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Carroll v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Antoniewicz v. ReszczynskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Harrison v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Henley v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. O'Leary v. CoenenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hrehorovich v. Harbor Hospital Center, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API