Legal Opinion
Betts v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 14, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2021-1861Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMANDA BETTS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1861 (CKK-MAU) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 14, 2026) Amanda Betts (“Betts”) brings this employment discrimination action against her former employer, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”). At this stage in the proceedings, Betts has three remaining claims left: a sex discrimination claim, a race discrimination claim, and a retaliation claim. WMATA moves for summary judgment on Betts’s remaining claims. Upon…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.