In re K.S.

¶1 The Appellant, mother S.S., appeals from the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order entered by the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, which terminated her parental rights with respect to K.S., D.S., and C.S. We affirm.

¶2 The mother presents the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err when it permitted Martina Heavy Runner to testify as an expert for purposes of the Indian Child Welfare Act?

¶4 2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it terminated the mother’s parental rights?

BACKGROUND

¶5 On October 6, 1999, the Cascade County Attorney’s…