Legal Opinion
Paternity of C.T.E.-h.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 2004No. 04-165PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 The mother (T.M.E.) appeals from the Order entered by the Tenth Judicial District Court, Fergus County, designating the father (S.H.) as the primary residential custodian of the child (C.T.E.). We affirm.
¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Was the District Court’s change of primary custody between the Interim and Final Parenting Plans supported by substantial evidence?
¶4 2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in determining that the child’s best interests were served by granting primary custody to the father?
¶5 3. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Powder River County v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Krause v. SiskMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Bahm v. SouthworthMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Custody of KrauseMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Custody of Arneson-NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Essex Insurance v. Moose's Saloon, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
- Smith v. McDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Green v. Gerber Stockton OilMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re the Marriage of ThornerMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Marriage of Toavs v. BulsMontana Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.