Legal Opinion

Waltham Piano Co. v. Wolcott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1913No. 4076PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from, ■Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by the Waltham Piano Company against J. E. Wolcott. From a judgment for defendant,'-' jllaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

As an investigation of the case-made discloses that certain letters evidencing the contract upon which defendant recovered in the trial court are omitted therefrom, and the briefs of plaintiff in error disclose that the errors relied upon for reversal cannot be passed upon without a consideration of the evidence, the motion to dismiss is sustained, and that, too, although the case-made recites that it contains “all the evidence offered, introduced, or received upon the trial.” Anderst v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 19 Okla. 206, 91 Pac. 894; Ragains v. Geiser Mfg. Co., 10 Okla. 544, 63 Pac.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. EngelkemeierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Ragains v. Geiser Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  3. Arnold v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Anderst v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. DillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Midland Valley Railroad v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Haggerty v. TerwilligerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Harrison v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. In Re Colling's GuardianshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Graham v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API