Legal Opinion

Claim of Wolfgram Ex Rel. Employment Security Benefits v. Employment Security Agency

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1955No. 8311PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Justice.

History of the Case

On February 10, 1953, claimant made an. initial claim for unemployment benefits pursuant to the Employment Security Law, I.C. § 72-1301 et seq. Immediately prior to making the claim, he had been employed by the Day Mines, Inc., as a eager and motorman. He had been laid off on account of plant curtailment. His claim was allowed and he was paid unemployment benefits from February 17, to March 21, 1953. On March 23 he was referred by the Employment Security Agency to the Federal Mining & Smelting Co. for underground work. He reported March 27 to the employment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fannon v. Federal Cartridge Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Suska Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Hoffstot v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Wolfgram v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Sledzianowski Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Claim of Watts v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Boodry v. Eddy Bakeries CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. In Re Walker's ClaimIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Norman v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Ramsey v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API