Legal Opinion
Ross v. Baldwin Filters & Liberty Mutual Insurance
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Decided December 10, 1996No. A-96-300PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mues, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Kathryn Ross appeals from a decision of the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court finding that her claim was barred by the statute of limitations and dismissing her petition.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Ross, 53 years old at the time of the hearing, began working at Baldwin Filters on September 20, 1976. Although the date is unclear, it appears that Ross first became aware of a skin problem associated with the paper at Baldwin Filters in November 1976. After informing her supervisor, Ross was moved to the “boxing” area, where she did not experience any further problems until 1986.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kelly v. KellyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Cords v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Osteen v. A. C. & S., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Hull v. Aetna InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co v. HatfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Ludwick v. Triwest Healthcare Alliance and Physicians Clinic, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Morris v. Nebraska Health SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Watson v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
- Rodriguez v. Monfort, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2001