Legal Opinion

Skvorc v. State, Personnel Board

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2000No. S-8398PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

An amended accusation issued by the Alaska Department of Law charged Paul Skvorc, an employee of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G), with twenty-three violations of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act.1 The Alaska Personnel Board found twenty-two violations, imposed a $10,-000 fine, and recommended terminating Skvorc’s employment. The superior court affirmed. The amended accusation did not charge Skvorc with twenty specific acts found by the board to be violations of the prohibition on misuse of state time and equipment. We therefore…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Washington Medical Disciplinary Board v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. RBG Bush Planes, LLC v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Skvorc v. State, Personnel BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API