Legal Opinion

Bettis v. Bowser

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 21, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-3625Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEROME BETTIS, Plaintiff, v. No. 19-cv-3625 (DLF) MURIEL BOWSER, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jerome Bettis, acting pro se, brings this civil rights lawsuit against several defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court are two motions to dismiss, one filed by various government defendants, Dkt. 13, the other filed by various private defendants, Dkt. 19. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the defendants’ motions. I. BACKGROUND 1 This case arises out of an incident at Bettis’s apartment in November 2018.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API