Legal Opinion
Anderson v. State
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1985No. 14613PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
Appellant Donald L. Anderson (Anderson) was convicted of forgery under SDCL 22-39-36. His attorney failed to perfect a timely appeal. Anderson then applied for a writ of habeas corpus and a peremptory writ was issued. After a hearing on the matter, the trial court quashed the writ of habeas corpus and dismissed an amended application for writ of habeas corpus. The trial court issued a certificate of probable cause and Anderson served and filed his notice of appeal. We affirm.
A jury convicted Anderson of forgery for cashing a check issued to his estranged wife, Jean Anderson,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Loop v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LunaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Loop v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Boykin v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Wilcox v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.