Legal Opinion
Schnoedewind v. Clark
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 19, 1950No. Civ. No. 33-115PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, Judge.
Motion by the defendant to dismiss this action on the ground that it has abated for the reason that the defendant Tom C. Clark, Attorney General of the United States as successor to the Alien Property Custodian, resigned from office on August 24, 1949, and on the same day was succeeded in office by J. Howard McGrath; that plaintiffs have not substituted the said J. Howard McGrath as defendant herein in the place and stead of defendant Tom C. Clark within six months after the said Mc-Grath took office, as required by Rule 25 (d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
On…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowles v. WilkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Becker Steel Co. of America v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Buck, Paymaster General of the Navy v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Bowles v. OhlhausenDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1947
- Kuttroff v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
3Cited by1 opinion
- Toshio Joji v. ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951