Steen v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, denying a motion to he relieved from a default. Lucas F. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
Appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to he relieved from a default.
The action between the parties herein was tried by the court without a jury, and its decision in favor of the plaintiff filed and judgment entered thereon December 26, 1902; and on the same day the plaintiff served upon the defendant a memorandum of his costs and disbursements, together with a written notice of said decision, and filed the same, together with the defendant’s acknowledgment of service indorsed thereon, in the office of the clerk. The said notice is in the following words: “Von are hereby notified…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Ingrim v. EppersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Brackett v. BanegasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Winchester v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Van Cott v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916