Braden v. Baugham
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
We will inquire first as to, whether the petition set out a cause of action against the defendant company. The defendant company is not liable under any construction of the words used. This is true because before the defendant company could be held liable, even if the words spoken were slanderous per se, it must affirmatively appear from the allegations of the petition that the defendant Baugham was expressly directed or authorized by the defendant company to'speak the words of which complaint is made. There is no such allegation in the petition. Cochran v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, 72 Ga.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Holmes v. ClisbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Whitley v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Cochran v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Jackson v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burrow v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- White v. Cudahy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Southland Corp. v. GarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Camp v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Southland Corporation v. GarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.