Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Zelmer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1994No. 18555-aPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice.

Mel Zelmer (“Zelmer”) and Zelmer, Inc. appeal from an order denying their motion to vacate a default judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

Donita Bolks (“Bolks”) is a resident of Minnehaha County who serves papers for lawyers. Johnson, Heidepriem, Miner and Marlow, on behalf of Kent and Lynette Mueller (“Mueller”), had her serve a summons and complaint upon Zelmer and Zelmer, Inc., a South Dakota corporation.

Bolks went to Zelmer’s home in Lincoln County. She presented him with the two summons and complaints. Zelmer signed two documents which were captioned “Admission of Service,” as follows:

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Nolan v. NolanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marilyn M. Marshall v. Mikel WarwickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. Gateway 2000, Inc. v. LimogesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Bradley v. DeloriaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ramsey v. MathisrudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Marilyn Marshall v. Mikel WarwickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API