Legal Opinion

Boylan v. George E. Bumpus, Jr. Construction Co. (In Re George E. Bumpus, Jr. Construction Co.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 13, 1992No. 19-10012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION REGARDING MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is defendant National Credit Union Administration’s (“NCUA”) Motion to Stay Proceedings. The Court held a hearing and thereafter took the matter under advisement. NCUA, as liquidating agent of defendant Blue Hill Federal Credit Union (“Blue Hill”), filed a motion to stay proceedings for ninety (90) days under 12 U.S.C. § 1787(b)(12). The plaintiffs in this adversary proceeding (collectively “Boylan”) oppose the motion.

As relevant here, the statute provides that

after the appointment of a ...…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1989
  3. Tuxedo Beach Club Corp. v. City Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  4. Prince George Joint Venture v. Sunbelt Savings, F.S.B.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hilco Property v. U.S.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Napa Valley I, LLC v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API