Legal Opinion
Napa Valley I, LLC v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 30, 2009No. 2:09-mj-00920Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Motion to Stay Proceedings — # 9
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant FDIC’s Emergency Motion to Stay Proceedings (# 9), filed on July 7, 2009. Plaintiffs Napa Valley I, LLC and Napa Valley II, LLC (“Napa Valley”) filed their Opposition to the FDIC’s Emergency Motion to Stay Proceedings (# 11) on July 22, 2009 and the FDIC filed its Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Emergency Motion to Stay Proceedings (# 12) on July 23, 2009. The Court conducted a hearing in this matter on July 28, 2009.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Botosan v. Paul McNally RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Praxis Properties, Inc. And Praxis Properties, Inc. For the State of New Jersey v. Colonial Savings Bank, S.L.A. The Resolution Trust Corporation, Colonial Federal Savings Bank v. Dynamic Industries Company, Inc. Angelo M. Gregos Nicholas Poulous and Sharp Construction Company, Inc. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver of Colonial Federal Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Whatley v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Continental SavingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Brady Development Company, Inc. v. Resolution Trust CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.