Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. IAB Marketing Associates, LP
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided September 18, 2013No. Case No. 12-61830-CivPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING RELIEF FROM ASSET FREEZE AND DENYING MOTION TO STAY
ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR., District Judge.
The IAB Defendants1 were involved in a scheme to market and sell healthcare plans to consumers by getting consumers to become members of an association that purported to offer members major or traditional health insurance, or the equivalent of such insurance. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleges that this scheme was deceptive in several ways. As detailed more fully below, the Court has found that the FTC is likely to prevail in proving that the scheme was deceptive and illegal, and that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ted Herring v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Banner Fund InternationalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. South Florida Water Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ETS Payphones, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Melford v. Kahane & Assocs.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
- Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Simple Health Plans LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
- E-Racer Tech, LLC v. Office of the Attorney General Department of Legal AffairsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Vylah Tec LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- Federal Trade Commission v. ACRO Services LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.