Legal Opinion

Jamie Hernandez v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 2019No. ED106789Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE JAMIE HERNANDEZ, ) No. ED106789 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County v. ) 12SL-CC01360 ) STATE OF MISSOURI, ) Honorable Joseph S. Dueker ) Respondent. ) Filed: July 16, 2019 OPINION Jamie Hernandez (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion under Rule 24.035 1 for post-conviction relief. Movant claims that the motion court erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing because plea counsel was ineffective for affirmatively…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API