Legal Opinion

People v. Stewart

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1890No. 20655PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new • trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

Defendant was indicted for and convicted of the crime of an assault with intent to commit rape upon the person of one Myrtle Collins, “a female *175child under the age of fourteen years.” He appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying him a new trial.

The appellant relies, among other grounds for reversal, upon the alleged error of the trial court in admitting evidence tending to show lewd, immoral, and indecent conduct of appellant with persons other than-said Myrtle Collins, and tending to show lewd acts and occurrences between appellant and such other persons. The evidence of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LenonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. People v. BowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. People v. McNuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. FalsettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. ChaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. People v. AsavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. State v. MasonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API