Legal Opinion
Martoni v. Massachusetts Fire & Marine Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 25, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The complaint sets up- that the defendant, for a consideration, executed to the plaintiff, the owner of an automobile, a policy of insurance upon it, agreeing to pay him the value of the automobile up to $1,200 in the event of its loss by theft at any time between June 4th, 1923, and June 4th, 1924, and that on or about December 6th, 1923, the automobile was stolen, and that at that time he furnished proofs of loss and performed all the conditions of the policy, and that defendant has not paid the loss.
The answer admits the making of the policy of insurance for the specified consideration and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hennessy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Vincent v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Asso.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Benanti v. Delaware InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Soper v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Wendle v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harty v. Eagle Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Manthey v. American Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Young v. American Fidelity Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. LevySupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Gaul v. CiglarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.