Legal Opinion

In re Carr

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original Proceedings in Habeas Corpus. Two petitions for writs of habeas corpus, filed in this-court, January 5, 1882 — one thereof by Timothy Carr, and the other by John Dillon. The petitioners/alleged that they were illegally deprived of their liberty by one W. D. Dis-brow, sheriff, and keeper of the common jail of the county off Shawnee, in the state of Kansas, at the city of Topeka, in- the county and state aforesaid.

Read the full summary

Original Proceedings in Habeas Corpus. Two petitions for writs of habeas corpus, filed in this-court, January 5, 1882 — one thereof by Timothy Carr, and the other by John Dillon. The petitioners/alleged that they were illegally deprived of their liberty by one W. D. Dis-brow, sheriff, and keeper of the common jail of the county off Shawnee, in the state of Kansas, at the city of Topeka, in- the county and state aforesaid. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion herein, filed at the June, 1882, session of the-court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court w^s delivered by

Hokton, C. J.:

Although these cases are separate and distinct, and although the offenses alleged are different, we shall consider them together, inasmuch as the facts in each case are-very similar, and the cases have been presented to us at the-same time. Carr and Dillon were in the employ of the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Rid. Co. as section foremen, with-headquarters at Kansas City, Mo. Carr was arrested for-forging time-checks, Dillon for obtaining money under false pretenses from the company. Upon preliminary examinations at Topeka, in Shawnee…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Addington v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. In re FowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. People v. BallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Thulemeyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API