Jeralee A. Tietz v. Local 10 of the International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
On May 15, 1975, the district court dismissed the Title VII complaint of Jeralee Tietz. 1 The order stated that it was “without prejudice to plaintiff’s right, should she seek to do so, to file an amended complaint within fifteen (15) days * * *.” Plaintiff did not amend her complaint. On May 30, without further action by the district court, she filed a notice of appeal. Both parties have filed briefs on the merits.
However, we are compelled to notice a lack of jurisdiction sua sponte. The order of May 15, from which plaintiff appeals, is not a final order. “It did not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jung v. K. & D. Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Western Electric Co. v. Pacent Reproducer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
3Cited by10 opinions
- WMX Technologies, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Heather Wilkinson v. Jacob Allen Shackelford Michelin North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Wmx Technologies, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Larry DRAKE, Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Guilford v. Spartan Food Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.