Commonwealth v. Stanley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge.
In this appeal from the judgment of sentence for conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol, we consider for the first time whether a jury’s knowledge that an appellant was given a preliminary breath test constitutes error warranting the grant of a new trial. We hold that while such information is inadmissible and may provide cause for a new trial, the error here was harmless and the judgment of sentence is affirmed.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of driving while under the influence of alcohol to a degree which rendered her incapable of safe driving. 75 Pa.C.S.A. §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CammSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. FoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. SwegerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. KarchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GironSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. SneeringerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. WatkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. MarshallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- United States v. Anthony George Iron Cloud, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.