Legal Opinion

Stein v. Rosenthal

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 21, 1952No. 12447-TPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOLIN, District Judge.

An Opinion is indicated because contentions have been made that the copyrights involved in this case are invalid for the same reasons which voided the same plaintiffs’ copyrights of similar subject matter in Stein v. Expert Lamp Company, 7 Cir., 1951, 188 F.2d 611, Id., D.C., 96 F.Supp. 97. There are points of similarity and also points of dissimilarity between the facts in this case and those in the cited case.

Plaintiffs are copyright proprietors concerning four copyrights for which the Register of 'Copyrights has issued certificates of 'registration in Class H,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Park-In-Theatres, Inc. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  3. Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. Ralph A. Freundlich, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. King Features Syndicate v. FleischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  5. Chas. D. Briddell, Inc. v. Alglobe Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Perlman v. FeldmannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
  4. Loew's Incorporated v. Columbia Broadcasting SystemDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
  5. Chemical Bank v. KimmelDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API