In re Assessment Against Property of Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeksON, J.
It will be noted tbat tbe parties to this controversy agreed tbat tbe court below find tbe facts. Certain facts were agreed to and tbe court beard tbe evidence and found tbe facts. Tbe finding of *759facts by tbe court are as binding on tbe litigants as tbe findings by a jury. 38 Cyc., p. 1933 et seq.
Tbe court below found tbe following facts: “Tbat tbe locus in quo is one of tbe streets opened after tbe adoption of said resolution by tbe authorities of tbe town of Kernersville, and since 1877 bas been maintained as a public street of tbe town, and bas been worked by tbe city forces and used by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Railroad v. OliveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Carolina Central Railroad v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kinston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Lloyd v. . VenableSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Wabash Ry. Co. v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Efird v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Kansas City Southern Railroad v. City of DeridderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.