Kevin Brott v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Twenty-three Michigan landowners filed suit in federal district court seeking compensation in excess of $10,000 for the United States’s alleged taking of their land for use as a public recreational trail. The landowners assert that they are entitled to have their claims considered in an Article III court and by a jury. However, Congress has acted constitutionally in bestowing on the Court of Federal Claims, an Article I court, exclusive jurisdiction over the landowners’ compensation claims and removing the right to a jury trial for claims brought in…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Julie Hautzenroeder v. Michael DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Ashh, Inc. v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Azar S. v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Commercial Law Corp. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Dancer v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.