Legal Opinion

Kevin Brott v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 31, 2017No. 16-1466PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Twenty-three Michigan landowners filed suit in federal district court seeking compensation in excess of $10,000 for the United States’s alleged taking of their land for use as a public recreational trail. The landowners assert that they are entitled to have their claims considered in an Article III court and by a jury. However, Congress has acted constitutionally in bestowing on the Court of Federal Claims, an Article I court, exclusive jurisdiction over the landowners’ compensation claims and removing the right to a jury trial for claims brought in…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Julie Hautzenroeder v. Michael DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Ashh, Inc. v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  3. Azar S. v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  4. Commercial Law Corp. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. Dancer v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API