Legal Opinion
Julie Hautzenroeder v. Michael DeWine
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 11, 2018No. 17-3395PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOK, Circuit Judge.
Due to her conviction for sexual battery, Julie Hautzenroeder must forever comply with Ohio's sex offender registration and notification laws. After her release from prison and community control, Hautzenroeder filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging her conviction with its attendant ongoing reporting burden. The district court dismissed the petition, deciding that it lacked jurisdiction under § 2254 because Hautzenroeder was no longer "in custody." Hautzenroeder timely appealed, and we AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
An Ohio jury found Hautzenroeder, a high school…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- M.S. Willman v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Peter Munoz, Jr. v. Gregory SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Louis Matthew Clements v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- Enrique Amaya v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Goguen v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.